Unlike phalloplasty, metoidioplasty involves transforming the clitoris, which has been enlarged by hormone treatment, into a phallus with sensitivity that allows the man to urinate standing up. Both surgeries have a very similar overall goal: to create a penis. However, the techniques, results, post-operative care, and recovery times are very different. For this reason, it is important to have all the information available to gain an in-depth understanding of the pros and cons of metoidioplasty, and to be able to choose the technique that best suits us and our needs. All this is possible after careful consideration with specialised medical support, such as that provided by IM Gender.

What is metoidioplasty?

Metoidioplasty is a genital masculinization surgery that uses the patient’s own genital tissue to create a neophallus. Prior to the procedure, hormone therapy is necessary to achieve a hypertrophied (enlarged) clitoris. With hormone treatment, the clitoris can grow to around 6 to 7 centimeters in length, depending on the individual’s response.

This gender-affirming surgery allows for the construction of a small but sensitive penis, enabling the person to urinate while standing and maintaining erotic sensitivity. The original nerve connections of the clitoris are preserved, resulting in a natural-looking outcome, although the final size of the penis is small.

It is a less invasive option than phalloplasty, as it does not require skin grafts from other parts of the body. Additionally, a scrotal pouch is created, where silicone testicular implants can be placed in a secondary surgery.

Results after vaginoplasty recovery

How Is Metoidioplasty Performed?

This gender-affirming surgery for trans men typically lasts between 5 and 6 hours and is performed under general anesthesia. During the procedure, a urethra is constructed from the base of the clitoris to the tip using a flap from the anterior vaginal wall — approximately 5 to 7.5 cm long and 2 to 3 cm wide – and a skin flap from the labia minora. The goal is to create a tube through which the person can urinate while standing.

Next, the scrotum is created by mobilizing the labia majora toward the back and suturing them along the midline to form the scrotal pouch. The insertion of testicular implants is usually delayed for several months to avoid complications due to pressure or swelling.

Pros and Cons of Metoidioplasty

It’s important to clarify that there is no single “correct” way to experience masculinity. Some individuals value urinary functionality (being able to urinate standing up), others prioritize aesthetics, sensitivity, or the possibility of engaging in penetrative sex. There are also trans men who do not feel the need for genital surgery at all. Therefore, the choice of one technique over another depends largely on each man’s expectations and goals.

Advantages of Metoidioplasty

Here are the main advantages of metoidioplasty that make this surgery appealing:

Sensitive and Erect Neophallus

One of the main reasons many people opt for metoidioplasty is the preservation of erotic sensitivity. Since clitoral tissue is used, which retains its original nerve connections, the neophallus maintains the capacity for intense sexual pleasure.

Ability to Urinate While Standing

Through urethral reconstruction (urethroplasty), the urethra can be lengthened and extended to the tip of the neophallus, allowing the person to urinate while standing—a very common desire among trans men.

Natural Appearance

The result of metoidioplasty is a small penis that is aesthetically recognizable as a phallus, without visible scarring in other body areas, as may occur with phalloplasty.

Less Complex and Invasive Surgery

Metoidioplasty uses genital tissue only, without the need for distant grafts as in phalloplasty. It also requires less operating time and has a shorter recovery period.

Drawbacks and Limitations

Now that you’re familiar with the advantages of metoidioplasty, here are the main drawbacks:

Required Hormone Therapy

The person must undergo hormone treatment to enlarge the clitoris, so that metoidioplasty is feasible. This process can take 1 to 2 years to reach the desired development. Medical assessment must determine whether the growth is sufficient for surgery. If growth is limited, this technique is not recommended, as the results may not be satisfactory.

Limited Neophallus Size

The main limitation of metoidioplasty is the small size of the resulting penis, which directly depends on the degree of clitoral hypertrophy from hormone therapy. This may not align with some trans men’s expectations regarding genital appearance.

Inability to Penetrate

The neophallus achieved through metoidioplasty usually does not allow for penetrative sex, as it typically lacks the length and rigidity required.

Urinary Complications

In some cases, constructing or lengthening the urethra can lead to risks such as fistulas or urethral strictures (narrowing), which may require additional surgeries.

Comparison with Phalloplasty

There are several differences between metoidioplasty and phalloplasty. Phalloplasty allows for the construction of a penis comparable in size to that of a cisgender man, unlike metoidioplasty. It involves tissue from another part of the body—typically the forearm—to achieve a functional and proportionate result.

Advantages of Phalloplasty vs. Metoidioplasty:

    • Larger size and appearance more similar to that of a cisgender man
    • Possibility of inserting a penile implant for penetrative sex
    • High sensitivity when flap nerves are connected to the clitoral dorsal nerve

Disadvantages

    • Longer, more technically complex surgery (around 7 hours)
    • Higher risk of complications, though most are resolved within the first month
    • Visible scar at the donor site (e.g., forearm), although aesthetic techniques such as fat grafting or micropigmentation can help improve the appearance

Results after vaginoplasty recovery

Which Surgery Is Right for Me?

There is no one-size-fits-all solution—this is a personal decision that should be made in an informed, realistic, and collaborative way with your medical team. Choosing between metoidioplasty and phalloplasty must be completely individualized. There is no “better” surgery, only the one best suited to your life goals. Understanding the pros and cons of both metoidioplasty and phalloplasty can help guide your final decision.

If you’re considering gender-affirming surgery such as metoidioplasty, IM GENDER’s team is here to support you with information, empathy, and experience.